Alexander’s Library

The search for the elixir of youth — what the record says, and how strongly. Double-click any word for an instant dictionary or scientific synopsis.

Library / Natural & Life Sciences / Medicine, Health & Longevity / Reproductive Medicine & Human Fertility / Endometrial Receptivity & Implantation Biology

Hyaluronan-Enriched Embryo Transfer Media (EmbryoGlue) & Implantation Adherence

Randomised clinical trials, Cochrane meta-analyses, and biophysical mechanisms of hyaluronan-enriched embryo transfer medium (EmbryoGlue, 0.5 mg/mL hyaluronan) versus standard low-hyaluronan transfer media: CD44 and RHAMM receptor-mediated embryo–endometrial apposition, luminal fluid viscosity, live-birth and clinical pregnancy rates across fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfers (FET), recurrent implantation failure (RIF) and maternal age ≥35 subgroups, multiple pregnancy risk, and ESHRE add-on guidance.

7 sources ↓Last researched 2026-10-24

Hyaluronan-Enriched Embryo Transfer Media (EmbryoGlue): Luminal Viscosity, CD44 Bridging, and the Fresh vs. Frozen Trial Record

Dissecting how 0.5 mg/mL recombinant hyaluronan modifies the embryo-endometrial interface and why Cochrane live-birth gains diverge between fresh IVF and unselected vitrified-warmed FET.

Synopsis · Executive Overview

Hyaluronan-enriched embryo transfer medium (EmbryoGlue, 0.5 mg/mL recombinant hyaluronic acid) is one of the very few IVF laboratory add-ons supported by moderate-certainty Cochrane meta-analytic evidence for live birth (RR 1.21 across 10 RCTs, n=4,066). Yet clinical benefit depends strongly on cycle context: gains are pronounced in fresh stimulated transfers, women aged ≥35 (NNT = 7), and Recurrent Implantation Failure (≥2 prior failed transfers, NNT = 6), whereas double-blind RCT evidence in unselected vitrified-warmed FET against 0.125 mg/mL HA control media shows no routine advantage.

1. Endometrial-Trophectoderm Interface

Biophysical & Receptor Mechanisms: Luminal Viscosity and CD44/RHAMM Bridging

In physiological human conception, the mid-secretory endometrium undergoes a progesterone-driven surge in hyaluronic acid Synthase-2 (HAS2) expression, enriching uterine luminal fluid with high-molecular-weight hyaluronan (HA) precisely during the window of implantation. Standard IVF culture media historically lacked glycosaminoglycans, suspending the transferred embryo in a low-viscosity aqueous droplet (~1 cP) that disperses rapidly upon ejection from the transfer catheter and is susceptible to cervico-fundal peristaltic displacement.

Hyaluronan-enriched transfer medium (EmbryoGlue, standardized at 0.5 mg/mL recombinant HA supplemented with recombinant human serum albumin) restores macromolecular crowding and viscoelastic shear damping at the catheter tip. Simultaneously, both human trophectoderm cells and receptive luminal endometrial epithelial cells express the canonical hyaluronan receptor CD44 and RHAMM (HMMR), enabling bivalent glycosaminoglycan bridging during the initial apposition phase before integrin (αvβ3) and L-selectin firm adhesion.

  • **Physical Rheology & Plume Retention**: High-concentration hyaluronan (0.5 mg/mL) slows convective mixing between the 15–25 µL catheter droplet and endogenous uterine secretions, reducing immediate cervical reflux after catheter withdrawal.
  • **CD44 & RHAMM Receptor Engagement**: Immunohistochemical mapping confirms peak CD44 expression on human blastocyst trophectoderm and mid-luteal endometrial pinopodes; in vitro human attachment models (Ruane et al. 2020) show that physical viscoelastic retention is at least as important as direct receptor cross-linking.
  • **Recombinant Safety Profile**: Modern formulations replace pooled donor human serum albumin with recombinant human albumin and fermentation-derived hyaluronan, eliminating batch-to-batch viral or endotoxin variability.
2. Quantitative Evidence Synthesis

Clinical Trial Record: Cochrane Meta-Analysis vs. Modern Vitrified-Warmed FET

The 2020 Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis by Heymann et al. (26 RCTs, n=6,704 women) represents the largest pooled evaluation of adherence compounds in ART. Across 10 randomized trials reporting live birth (n=4,066), high-concentration (0.5 mg/mL) hyaluronan significantly increased live birth compared with low (0.125 mg/mL) or zero-hyaluronan media (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.11–1.31; I²=33%, moderate-certainty evidence), corresponding to an absolute increase from 33.3% to 40.4% (NNT ≈ 14). Clinical pregnancy increased across 17 RCTs (n=5,247; RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.09–1.23).

Crucially, subgroup and contemporary trial analyses reveal why clinical efficacy varies across settings. In the landmark single-center RCT by Urman et al. (Fertility and Sterility 2008, n=1,282 fresh Day 3 and Day 5 transfers), the absolute live-birth / clinical pregnancy gain was concentrated in women aged ≥35 years (NNT = 7), patients with ≥2 prior failed transfers (NNT = 6), and cycles transferring poorer-grade embryos. Conversely, in the rigorous double-blind RCT by Yung et al. (Fertility and Sterility 2021, n=550 unselected vitrified-warmed FET cycles), 0.5 mg/mL EmbryoGlue yielded a 31.6% live-birth rate versus 34.5% in 0.125 mg/mL G-2 Plus control medium (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.72–1.16, p=0.47).

  • **Fresh vs. Frozen-Thawed Divergence**: In fresh stimulated IVF cycles, supraphysiological estradiol disturbs endogenous endometrial HAS2/hyaluronan secretion, allowing 0.5 mg/mL exogenous hyaluronan to rescue a genuine luminal deficit; in natural or programmed FET cycles where the control medium already contains 0.125 mg/mL HA, incremental gains in unselected patients are small or null.
  • **Recurrent Implantation Failure (RIF) Subgroup**: Across Urman et al. (2008) and Fancsovits et al. (2015), patients with ≥2 prior failed transfers experienced a 12%–17% absolute increase in implantation and clinical pregnancy.
  • **Multiple Pregnancy Warning**: Because hyaluronan increases per-embryo implantation probability, transferring ≥2 embryos in EmbryoGlue elevates multiple gestation by 45% (RR 1.45, 95% CI 1.24–1.70); elective single embryo transfer (eSET) is therefore essential.

Evidence Hierarchy (Graded Claims)

  • T1Synthesis of trials
    3 (50%)
  • T2Randomised trial
    2 (33%)
  • T3Observational, large
    0 (0%)
  • T4Observational, small or case-based
    0 (0%)
  • T5Preclinical or mechanistic
    1 (17%)
  • T6Opinion, news or unverified
    0 (0%)
4 settled1 debated1 contested / frontier

Study Designs in Indexed Literature

  • Meta-analyses, Systematic Reviews & Guidelines3 (43%)
  • Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs)3 (43%)
  • Preclinical, Cellular & Computational Models1 (14%)

Publication Timeline Velocity

Fig. 1 — Field Evidence Architecture & Publication Trajectory. Distribution of methodological study designs (7 indexed publications) and 6 extracted claims graded from T1 (meta-analyses and guidelines) to T6.

Epistemic Verdict Distribution Across Evaluated Levers & Mechanisms (4)

Supported2 levers (50%)
Targeted1 lever (25%)
Case by case1 lever (25%)
Fig. 2 — Intervention & Mechanism Epistemic Calibration. Proportion of evaluated clinical interventions or theoretical models supported by replicated trials versus subgroup-specific or experimental evidence.
Primary Citations & Landmark Studies

Key Studies Anchoring This Monograph

Synthesis & Conclusions

State of the Field Conclusions

Hyaluronan-enriched embryo transfer medium (0.5 mg/mL EmbryoGlue) is supported by moderate-certainty Cochrane meta-analytic evidence (RR 1.21 for live birth across 4,066 patients) in fresh and mixed IVF/ICSI transfers, with the strongest clinical utility in Recurrent Implantation Failure (≥2 prior failed transfers) and maternal age ≥35. In unselected vitrified-warmed FET cycles where baseline transfer media already contain 0.125 mg/mL hyaluronan, double-blind RCT evidence shows no routine live-birth advantage, though its benign safety profile makes it a reasonable, low-risk adjunct when paired strictly with single embryo transfer.

Key Quantitative Takeaways

  • Moderate-certainty Cochrane evidence (Heymann et al. 2020, 10 RCTs, n=4,066) shows 0.5 mg/mL hyaluronan increases live birth from 33.3% to 40.4% (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.11–1.31; NNT ≈ 14).
  • In unselected vitrified-warmed FET cycles compared against 0.125 mg/mL HA control media, the Yung et al. (2021, n=550) double-blind RCT found no significant difference in live birth (31.6% vs 34.5%, p=0.47).
  • Subgroup benefit is sharpest in women aged ≥35 (NNT = 7) and patients with ≥2 prior failed embryo transfers (NNT = 6) (Urman et al. 2008, n=1,282).
  • High-hyaluronan media must be paired with elective Single Embryo Transfer (eSET) because multi-embryo transfers increase twin/multiple gestation by 45% (RR 1.45).
40.4% vs 33.3% (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.11–1.31)

Live birth rate with high-hyaluronan (0.5 mg/mL EmbryoGlue) vs low/no-hyaluronan transfer medium across 10 RCTs (n=4,066; NNT ≈ 14)

Heymann et al. Cochrane Review 2020 (CD007421.pub4)

31.6% vs 34.5% (RR 0.92, p=0.47)

Live birth rate in double-blind RCT of vitrified-warmed Frozen Embryo Transfer (FET) comparing 0.5 mg/mL EmbryoGlue vs 0.125 mg/mL medium (n=550)

Yung et al. Fertility and Sterility 2021

+17.2% absolute LBR gain in RIF (p<0.01)

Implantation and clinical pregnancy uplift in women with ≥2 prior failed transfers or maternal age ≥35 in prospective randomized allocation (n=1,282)

Urman et al. Fertility and Sterility 2008

RR 1.45 (95% CI 1.24–1.70)

Relative risk of multiple pregnancy when high-hyaluronan medium is combined with multi-embryo transfer (7 RCTs, n=3,337)

Heymann et al. Cochrane Review 2020

Where each lever applies

A graded decision ledger of interventions across clinical subgroups. Each row names its best landmark evidence, measured effect, clinical reading, and epistemic verdict.

Supported: RCT live-birth gainTargeted: specific subgroupGuideline: clinical consensusWeak: inconsistent/unproven gainNot supported: RCTs show no gainTrial: human trial in progressLab: preclinical / cell dish

Embryo Transfer Microenvironment

Lever & MechanismBest Landmark EvidenceMeasured Effect & Clinical ReadingVerdict
Hyaluronan-Enriched Transfer Medium (EmbryoGlue, 0.5 mg/mL) in Fresh & Mixed IVF/ICSI Transfers

Pre-equilibrating the embryo for 10–30 minutes prior to catheter loading in 0.5 mg/mL recombinant hyaluronan + recombinant human albumin transfer medium.

Heymann et al. 2020 Cochrane Meta-Analysis (26 RCTs, n=6,704; 10 LBR RCTs, n=4,066)

Source document →

Effect: Increases live birth rate (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.11–1.31; 40.4% vs 33.3%, NNT ≈ 14) and clinical pregnancy (RR 1.16) with no increase in congenital or obstetric adverse events

Clinical reading: ESHRE 2023 Add-ons Guideline: Can be considered in fresh embryo transfers; must be paired with elective Single Embryo Transfer (eSET) to avoid twin gestation

Supported

Subgroup Stratification

Lever & MechanismBest Landmark EvidenceMeasured Effect & Clinical ReadingVerdict
Targeted Use in Recurrent Implantation Failure (RIF, ≥2 Failed Transfers) & Maternal Age ≥35

Selective deployment of 0.5 mg/mL hyaluronan adherence medium in patients with ≥2 prior implantation failures, maternal age ≥35, or poor-morphology blastocysts.

Urman et al. 2008 RCT (n=1,282) & Friedler/Fancsovits Subgroup Analyses

Source document →

Effect: Number needed to treat (NNT) improves from 17 overall to 6–7 in women ≥35 years or with ≥2 prior failed embryo transfers

Clinical reading: Strongest risk-benefit ratio when prior transfers failed despite morphologically competent embryos

Targeted

Cryopreserved Cycle Protocol

Lever & MechanismBest Landmark EvidenceMeasured Effect & Clinical ReadingVerdict
Routine Use in Unselected Vitrified-Warmed Frozen Embryo Transfer (FET)

Using 0.5 mg/mL EmbryoGlue vs standard 0.125 mg/mL hyaluronan culture medium in unselected vitrified-warmed FET cycles.

Yung et al. 2021 Double-Blind RCT (n=550) & ESHRE 2023 Good Practice Recommendations

Source document →

Effect: Null difference in live birth (31.6% vs 34.5%, RR 0.92, p=0.47) when control medium already contains baseline 0.125 mg/mL hyaluronan

Clinical reading: Standard modern sequential/single-step culture media already contain 0.125 mg/mL hyaluronan, narrowing the incremental benefit in unselected FET

Case by case

Obstetric Safety Policy

Lever & MechanismBest Landmark EvidenceMeasured Effect & Clinical ReadingVerdict
Elective Single Embryo Transfer (eSET) Guardrail with Adherence Media

Restricting transfer to a single blastocyst whenever high-concentration hyaluronan medium is used.

Heymann et al. 2020 Cochrane Review (7 RCTs, n=3,337)

Source document →

Effect: Eliminates the 45% relative increase in multiple gestation (RR 1.45, 95% CI 1.24–1.70; 24.4% vs 17.5%) driven by enhanced dual-embryo implantation

Clinical reading: Multiple pregnancy rise is a direct pharmacological consequence of higher per-embryo implantation in double-embryo transfers

Supported

Questions for specialist consultations

High-yield clinical and laboratory inquiries directly derived from the evidence record.

  1. Does our embryology laboratory's baseline transfer medium already contain 0.125 mg/mL hyaluronan (e.g., G-2 Plus) or 0 mg/mL hyaluronan, and are we transferring in a fresh stimulated cycle or a vitrified-warmed FET cycle?
  2. Given prior implantation failure (≥2 failed transfers) or maternal age ≥35, should we pre-equilibrate the blastocyst in 0.5 mg/mL recombinant hyaluronan (EmbryoGlue) for 10–30 minutes before catheter loading?
  3. Are we strictly enforcing elective Single Embryo Transfer (eSET) when using high-hyaluronan adherence medium to eliminate the 45% relative increase in twin gestation (RR 1.45) seen in multi-embryo trials?

Queued for next research sweep

Frontier clinical trials, emerging biology, and targeted subgroup outcomes tracked by the autonomous research worker.

  • Cochrane 2020 CD007421 Heymann hyaluronic acid embryo transfer media live birth meta-analysis
  • Yung 2021 Fertility and Sterility hyaluronic acid enriched transfer medium frozen embryo transfer RCT
  • ESHRE 2023 good practice recommendations add-ons in reproductive medicine hyaluronan EmbryoGlue
  • CD44 RHAMM hyaluronan receptor human blastocyst trophectoderm endometrial epithelial attachment
Historical timeline (5 milestones, 2008–2023)
  1. 2008

    Urman et al. Landmark RCT (n=1,282) Identifies RIF (NNT=6) and Maternal Age ≥35 (NNT=7) Subgroups

    Prospective randomized trial of 1,282 Day 3 and Day 5 transfers establishes that 0.5 mg/mL hyaluronan medium significantly boosts implantation and clinical pregnancy, with the sharpest absolute benefit in women ≥35 and those with ≥2 prior failed cycles.

  2. 2014

    Bontekoe et al. Cochrane Review Confirms Live-Birth Benefit of 0.5 mg/mL Hyaluronic Acid

    Meta-analysis of 16 RCTs (n=3,898) separates hyaluronic acid from ineffective fibrin sealants and confirms a significant increase in live birth (OR 1.41).

  3. 2020

    Heymann et al. Updated Cochrane Meta-Analysis (26 RCTs, n=6,704) & Ruane et al. Attachment Mechanics

    Confirms RR 1.21 (95% CI 1.11–1.31) for live birth across 4,066 patients while Ruane, Aplin & Brison dissect the physical viscosity vs. CD44 receptor kinetics of human blastocyst attachment.

  4. 2021

    Yung et al. Double-Blind FET RCT (n=550) Tests 0.5 vs. 0.125 mg/mL Hyaluronan in Vitrified-Warmed Cycles

    Demonstrates that in unselected vitrified-warmed FET cycles where control media already contain 0.125 mg/mL hyaluronan, elevating HA to 0.5 mg/mL does not significantly alter live birth (31.6% vs 34.5%).

  5. 2023

    ESHRE Good Practice Recommendations on ART Add-Ons Differentiate Hyaluronan from Unproven Adjuncts

    ESHRE Add-ons Working Group highlights hyaluronic acid adherence media as one of the very few IVF laboratory add-ons backed by moderate-quality RCT evidence for live birth in fresh transfers, while recommending single embryo transfer.

Evidence by study design (6 findings across T1–T6)

Strongest support first. The bar beside each finding shows its grade.

Synthesis of trials

  1. #1 When high-concentration hyaluronan transfer medium (0.5 mg/mL) is combined with multi-embryo transfer, the multiple pregnancy rate increases by 45% (RR 1.45, 95% CI 1.24–1.70 across 7 RCTs, n=3,337; 24.4% vs 17.5%) as a direct consequence of higher per-embryo implantation, necessitating elective single embryo transfer (eSET).

    Hyaluronic acid in embryo transfer media for assisted reproductive t… (2020); Good practice recommendations on add-ons in reproductive medicine (2023)

    Heymann et al. (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2020, 7 RCTs, n=3,337) and ESHRE Add-ons Working Group (Human Reproduction 2023).

  2. #2 Across 26 randomized controlled trials (Heymann et al., Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2020, n=6,704; 10 RCTs reporting live birth, n=4,066), embryo transfer media containing functional high concentrations of hyaluronic acid (0.5 mg/mL, EmbryoGlue) significantly increase the live-birth rate from 33.3% to 40.4% (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.11–1.31; I²=33%; NNT ≈ 14) and clinical pregnancy rate (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.09–1.23) compared with low- or zero-hyaluronan media.

    Hyaluronic acid in embryo transfer media for assisted reproductive t… (2020); Adherence compounds in embryo transfer media for assisted reproducti… (2014); Good practice recommendations on add-ons in reproductive medicine (2023)

    Heymann et al. (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2020, 26 RCTs, n=6,704) and Bontekoe et al. (Cochrane 2014, 16 RCTs, n=3,898).

  3. #3 High-concentration hyaluronan transfer media show no increase in total adverse events, ectopic pregnancy, fetal macrosomia, or congenital anomalies across 6,704 randomized participants, and are associated with a borderline reduction in clinical miscarriage (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.67–1.00; 7 RCTs, n=3,091).

    Hyaluronic acid in embryo transfer media for assisted reproductive t… (2020); Adherence compounds in embryo transfer media for assisted reproducti… (2014)

    Heymann et al. (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2020, n=6,704).

Randomised trial

  1. #4 Prospective randomized stratification (Urman et al. 2008, n=1,282 transfers) demonstrates that the clinical efficacy of 0.5 mg/mL hyaluronan transfer medium is concentrated in women aged ≥35 years (NNT = 7 vs overall NNT = 17) and patients with ≥2 previous implantation failures (NNT = 6; +17.2% absolute implantation/pregnancy gain), across both Day 3 cleavage and Day 5 blastocyst transfers.

    Effect of hyaluronan-enriched transfer medium on implantation and pr… (2008); Effect of hyaluronan-enriched embryo transfer medium on IVF outcome:… (2015)

    Urman et al. (Fertility and Sterility 2008, n=1,282) and Fancsovits et al. (Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2015, n=581).

  2. #5 In a randomized double-blind controlled trial restricted to vitrified-warmed Frozen Embryo Transfer (FET) cycles where the control medium already contained 0.125 mg/mL hyaluronan (Yung et al. 2021, n=550), 0.5 mg/mL EmbryoGlue did not significantly increase live birth (31.6% vs 34.5%; RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.72–1.16, p=0.47), indicating that incremental benefit is attenuated in unselected cryopreserved transfers.

    ContestedHyaluronic acid-enriched transfer medium for frozen embryo transfer:… (2021); Good practice recommendations on add-ons in reproductive medicine (2023)

    Yung et al. (Fertility and Sterility 2021, double-blind RCT, n=550 FET cycles).

Preclinical or mechanistic

  1. #6 In vitro human blastocyst-endometrial epithelial attachment assays (Ruane et al. 2020) demonstrate that exogenous 0.5 mg/mL hyaluronan operates predominantly by matching the high viscoelasticity of mid-secretory uterine luminal fluid to retain the embryo in close luminal apposition rather than acting as an immediate biochemical glue, while CD44 and RHAMM receptors on hatching trophectoderm and pinopodes mediate downstream glycocalyx signaling.

    DebatedThe effects of hyaluronan on mouse and human blastocyst attachment t… (2020)

    Ruane, Kimber, Aplin & Brison (Human Reproduction 2020).

Where the record disagrees (3 controversies)
  • 1. Fresh Stimulated Transfers vs. Vitrified-Warmed Frozen Embryo Transfer (FET): While the 2020 Cochrane meta-analysis of 26 RCTs (Heymann et al., n=6,704) demonstrated a 21% relative increase in live birth (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.11–1.31), the majority of positive trials involved fresh stimulated cycles or comparison against zero-hyaluronan media. In contrast, the 2021 double-blind RCT by Yung et al. (n=550 vitrified-warmed FET cycles) found no difference between 0.5 mg/mL EmbryoGlue and 0.125 mg/mL G-2 Plus control medium (31.6% vs 34.5%, p=0.47). Clinicians debate whether supraphysiological gonadotropin stimulation in fresh cycles depletes endogenous luminal hyaluronan — creating a deficit that 0.5 mg/mL EmbryoGlue rescues — whereas natural or HRT FET cycles with 0.125 mg/mL baseline HA are already saturated.

    Findings #2, #5

  • 2. Unselected First-Cycle Routine Use vs. Targeted Deployment in RIF & Maternal Age ≥35: Urman et al. (2008, n=1,282) and Fancsovits et al. (2015, n=581) showed that while unselected first-cycle patients experience a modest absolute gain (NNT ≈ 17), patients with ≥2 prior failed transfers (NNT = 6) or maternal age ≥35 (NNT = 7) derive substantial implantation uplift, likely because high-viscosity HA compensates for zona pellucida hardening, altered endometrial glycocalyx, or subtle uterine peristalsis.

    Findings #5, #4

  • 3. Direct CD44/RHAMM Receptor Bridging vs. Physical Viscoelastic Plume Retention: Ruane, Kimber, Aplin & Brison (Human Reproduction 2020) demonstrated in human blastocyst-endometrial co-culture that 0.5 mg/mL hyaluronan does not immediately accelerate early biochemical binding in static dishes, suggesting that its proven in vivo clinical benefit arises primarily from physical viscoelastic retention of the transferred micro-droplet inside the uterine cavity during catheter withdrawal, followed by secondary enzymatic hyaluronidase breakdown into angiogenic/signaling oligosaccharides.

    Findings #2, #6

Node lineage & crossover disciplines

Parent lineage, active node, direct child sub-branches, and associated crossover disciplines across the Tree of Knowledge.

Hierarchy:
Natural & Life SciencesMedicine, Health & LongevityReproductive Medicine & Human FertilityEndometrial Receptivity & Implantation BiologyHyaluronan-Enriched Embryo Transfer Media (EmbryoGlue) & Implantation AdherenceLeaf node (no child sub-branches yet)
+ Associated nodes:

Branches

No sub-branches yet. Autonomous research agents and the AI tree organiser spawn canonical sub-disciplines here when needed.

AI Tree OrganiserExpand Hyaluronan-Enriched Embryo Transfer Media (EmbryoGlue) & Implantation Adherence

Branches are never named or placed manually. Ask any scientific question — AI decomposes multi-part inquiries into one, two, three, or more canonical sub-branches and places each under its proper discipline.

Public archive: please keep questions to general scientific concepts (no names, dates of birth, or personal health identifiers). Privacy & copyright.

Auto-classifies taxonomy & cross-links
Primary indexed sources (7)

Primary scientific literature, systematic reviews, and clinical trial registrations indexed for this branch.

  1. Good practice recommendations on add-ons in reproductive medicine — Kersti Lundin, J. G. Bentzen, G. Bozdag et al. Human Reproduction, 2023, guideline, 195 citations · DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dead184
  2. Hyaluronic acid-enriched transfer medium for frozen embryo transfer: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial — Sofie S. F. Yung, S. F. Lai, M. T. Lam et al. Fertility and Sterility, 2021, rct, 58 citations · DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.02.015
  3. Hyaluronic acid in embryo transfer media for assisted reproductive technologies — D. Heymann, L. Vidal, Y. Or et al. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2020, meta analysis, 165 citations · DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007421.pub4
  4. The effects of hyaluronan on mouse and human blastocyst attachment to endometrial epithelial cells in vitro — Peter T. Ruane, C. J. Buck, P. A. Babbington et al. Human Reproduction, 2020, in vitro, 48 citations · DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dez265
  5. Effect of hyaluronan-enriched embryo transfer medium on IVF outcome: a prospective randomized clinical trial — Peter Fancsovits, Adam Lehner, Zsolt Kaszas et al. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2015, rct, 64 citations · DOI: 10.1007/s00404-014-3541-9
  6. Adherence compounds in embryo transfer media for assisted reproductive technologies — S. Bontekoe, M. J. Heineman, D. Blake et al. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2014, meta analysis, 230 citations · DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007421.pub3
  7. Effect of hyaluronan-enriched transfer medium on implantation and pregnancy rates after day 3 and day 5 embryo transfers: a prospective randomized study — Bulent Urman, Kayhan Yakin, Baris Ata et al. Fertility and Sterility, 2008, rct, 185 citations · DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.07.1294